Saturday, April 13, 2013
Game of Thrones Podcast: Valar Dohaeris and Dark Wings, Dark Words
My latest podcast with the Tuning In To SciFi gang is now up!
We cover the first two episodes of season 3: "Valar Dohaeris" and "Dark Wings, Dark Words."
For the link to the Tuning in to SciFi TV page for the podcast (where you can direct download and/or play in your browser), go here:
Game of Thrones Season 3 Podcast - Episodes 1 and 2
For the entire Tuning in to SciFi TV podcast feed in iTunes, you will find it here.
Thursday, April 4, 2013
Some Thoughts on the Updated UGA Brand Identity
Earlier this week, UGA unveiled an updated brand identity. The official announcement is here, complete with some video, press release verbiage, and PDFs of the updated imagery and wordmarks. The laser-focused UniWatch blog even felt compelled to comment on it here.
Judging from twitter and Dawg blog reactions, the general consensus seems to be "Why?" I can understand that. People are resistant to change. And there's probably no group more steeped in appreciation for "tradition" and "status quo" than southerners, particularly southern football fans. Plus, the fact that Nike was involved left many rending their garments (no pun intended) and fearing that we were going to Oregon ourselves up and look like an Arena Football team on acid (like those horrific Pro Combat unis we trotted out vs. Boise State a couple of years ago). Thankfully, the changes were fairly minor, all things considered.
As for the "why," left me offer a few thoughts. I'm a proud UGA grad, fan, and season ticket holder. I've also worked in branding, marketing, and advertising for over two decades, both from a strategic and creative viewpoint. So I think I have a pretty good understanding of all aspects of this situation.
Most folks don't consciously realize it, but there is a tremendous value in a brand. When you mention a product category -- cars, electronics, soft drinks, restaurants, beer, apparel...you name it -- you instantly think of a brand. And the brands that rise to the top of your consciousness and preference are typically the ones that do the best job of branding. An important part of branding is consistency. Every time you walk into a Home Depot, or see an ad for Coke, or pick up an Apple product, you get a brand experience, complete with consistent logos, colors, typefaces and "brand identities." This stuff can be subtle, but it's critical to reinforcing what the brand stands for and how it is represented. A good brand looks the same no matter where you see it: on the web, on a billboard, on an ad, on a uniform, or on a golf shirt.
90% of what UGA did this week was bring some consistency to how "our" brand is represented. Think about our sports teams and their unis. At a glance, you might think the football, gymnastics, baseball, hoops, track, and other sporting teams had consistent unis. There was red. And black. And silver. And grey. And white. But were they all the exact same versions of those colors? Not always. And really, there were many different fonts going on, for both letters and numbers. The words "Georgia" and "Bulldogs" were also shown different ways. Now there's one primary way to do it, and I think it looks quite nice:
That also doesn't take into account how UGA was represented on official documents and websites, which had their own inconsistencies. And we won't even get into the world of officially licensed products (Just look around your tailgate: how many different logos, fonts, and versions of the color red are on your shirts, coozies, flags, chairs, and other merchandise?).
Why would we NOT want all these things to be consistent and reinforce the UGA brand identity? Why wouldn't we want to put our best foot forward and make our public-facing brand the very best it can be? College athletics and team branding is a multi-billion dollar business, and wouldn't we rather be an Apple instead of a BlackBerry?
So looking over the new brand standards, I applaud what was done. Going forward, the typefaces for virtually everything will be standardized. The PMS colors will be standardized. When you see one Georgia team, you will get the feeling that they are an extension of a larger whole, and that's a good thing.
Here's the important thing: The "G" isn't going anywhere. It's not changing. One of the most recognizable logos in college sports is staying the exact same. Right there in all the brand materials it is called our PRIMARY athletic mark:
Probably the most controversial aspect of the branding initiative was the creation of a new "bulldog" logo, which will replace the old version as the SECONDARY athletic mark:
We all grew up with the "old" version. It is beloved. It currently adorns many items in all of our homes. I love it.
However, from a marketing standpoint, I can understand the need and desire to create something "new." I haven't seen any of the creative briefs or brand rationales. However, I can imagine that there's some dialogue in them that sounds something like this:
Well, I'm sure that last point wasn't put in a brief for public consumption, but we all know that's part of it, right? And I've got no problem with it. This is a business, after all.
And you know what? I don't dislike the new logo. In fact, after sitting with it for a few days, I actually kind of like it. That doesn't diminish my affection for the old one. I'll still proudly wear my apparel with the "classic" logo. Having something new doesn't threaten having something older, too (unless you're talking about marriage). I like strips and ribeyes. I drink Crown and Makers. I played around and made a quick iPhone 4S wallpaper with the new elements, and it's not that bad:
The one aspect that still rubs me the wrong way is the treatment of our "silver britches." Over the years, they've gone from silver to "dull grey." McGarity even addressed that here:
Read more here: http://www.macon.com/2013/04/02/2421536/georgia-adopts-a-bulldog-bold.html#storylink=cpy
I understand that "metallics" is one of the hardest things to represent consistently, given that it needs to appear on various types of cloth, of paper, of plastic, and digitally. But invoking the Cowboys doesn't fill me with confidence:
Look at the pants and the helmet above. Would any rational person call those THE SAME? Fortunately, our scheme doesn't require the same metallic color represented in two different materials, but how fucking hard can it be to create silver britches?
So at the end of the day, I really like and endorse what we've done. We're still Red and Black. We're still committed to the G. We still have the Arches. We're still the Dawgs. We still have the G as our primary logo. We didn't go "Full Oregon." We tweaked. We refined. We streamlined. We strengthened our brand. And in the long run, I think that's a good thing.
Go Dawgs. All of them.
Judging from twitter and Dawg blog reactions, the general consensus seems to be "Why?" I can understand that. People are resistant to change. And there's probably no group more steeped in appreciation for "tradition" and "status quo" than southerners, particularly southern football fans. Plus, the fact that Nike was involved left many rending their garments (no pun intended) and fearing that we were going to Oregon ourselves up and look like an Arena Football team on acid (like those horrific Pro Combat unis we trotted out vs. Boise State a couple of years ago). Thankfully, the changes were fairly minor, all things considered.
As for the "why," left me offer a few thoughts. I'm a proud UGA grad, fan, and season ticket holder. I've also worked in branding, marketing, and advertising for over two decades, both from a strategic and creative viewpoint. So I think I have a pretty good understanding of all aspects of this situation.
Most folks don't consciously realize it, but there is a tremendous value in a brand. When you mention a product category -- cars, electronics, soft drinks, restaurants, beer, apparel...you name it -- you instantly think of a brand. And the brands that rise to the top of your consciousness and preference are typically the ones that do the best job of branding. An important part of branding is consistency. Every time you walk into a Home Depot, or see an ad for Coke, or pick up an Apple product, you get a brand experience, complete with consistent logos, colors, typefaces and "brand identities." This stuff can be subtle, but it's critical to reinforcing what the brand stands for and how it is represented. A good brand looks the same no matter where you see it: on the web, on a billboard, on an ad, on a uniform, or on a golf shirt.
90% of what UGA did this week was bring some consistency to how "our" brand is represented. Think about our sports teams and their unis. At a glance, you might think the football, gymnastics, baseball, hoops, track, and other sporting teams had consistent unis. There was red. And black. And silver. And grey. And white. But were they all the exact same versions of those colors? Not always. And really, there were many different fonts going on, for both letters and numbers. The words "Georgia" and "Bulldogs" were also shown different ways. Now there's one primary way to do it, and I think it looks quite nice:
That also doesn't take into account how UGA was represented on official documents and websites, which had their own inconsistencies. And we won't even get into the world of officially licensed products (Just look around your tailgate: how many different logos, fonts, and versions of the color red are on your shirts, coozies, flags, chairs, and other merchandise?).
Why would we NOT want all these things to be consistent and reinforce the UGA brand identity? Why wouldn't we want to put our best foot forward and make our public-facing brand the very best it can be? College athletics and team branding is a multi-billion dollar business, and wouldn't we rather be an Apple instead of a BlackBerry?
So looking over the new brand standards, I applaud what was done. Going forward, the typefaces for virtually everything will be standardized. The PMS colors will be standardized. When you see one Georgia team, you will get the feeling that they are an extension of a larger whole, and that's a good thing.
Here's the important thing: The "G" isn't going anywhere. It's not changing. One of the most recognizable logos in college sports is staying the exact same. Right there in all the brand materials it is called our PRIMARY athletic mark:
New Bulldog
Old Bulldog
We all grew up with the "old" version. It is beloved. It currently adorns many items in all of our homes. I love it.
However, from a marketing standpoint, I can understand the need and desire to create something "new." I haven't seen any of the creative briefs or brand rationales. However, I can imagine that there's some dialogue in them that sounds something like this:
- The old bulldog is asymmetrical. Facing left. We should probably have something that is centered, balanced, facing forward, and looks the same from every angle.
- The old bulldog logo is hand drawn, and contains many, many small lines and details. This makes is difficult to reproduce accurately across different media and applications and sizes, particularly on apparel that has to be stitched (depending on the vendor and their equipment). We need something that can be consistently executed across all materials and media.
- The different weighting of lines, shadows, and detail also makes the old logo appear differently at different distances. By simplifying and moving to more clean and bold lines, the new logo will stand out and present a consistent representation up close and at a distance.
- Younger fans have grown up in an era of apps and symmetrically presented icons for buttons, labels, and badges. This will appeal to them and more easily integrate into the digital world.
- It would be nice if the new bulldog more closely resembles the world's best live mascot, too.
- We will still keep the old bulldog as an "Additional Athletic Mark" and we can develop merchandise around it as a line of "classic" products.
- We can sell new logo'd shit.
Well, I'm sure that last point wasn't put in a brief for public consumption, but we all know that's part of it, right? And I've got no problem with it. This is a business, after all.
And you know what? I don't dislike the new logo. In fact, after sitting with it for a few days, I actually kind of like it. That doesn't diminish my affection for the old one. I'll still proudly wear my apparel with the "classic" logo. Having something new doesn't threaten having something older, too (unless you're talking about marriage). I like strips and ribeyes. I drink Crown and Makers. I played around and made a quick iPhone 4S wallpaper with the new elements, and it's not that bad:
The one aspect that still rubs me the wrong way is the treatment of our "silver britches." Over the years, they've gone from silver to "dull grey." McGarity even addressed that here:
"As new technology comes up, as new fabric becomes available, you'll see that morph into maybe more (like) our silver britches," McGarity said. "It all has to do with what kind of fabric and color these people do. You know, kind of like the (Dallas) Cowboys wear? That's the kind of silver you'd like to get, which is kind of like what we used to have, which had kind of a shine to them. It just depends on how fast they can get that material. ...
"That'd be the goal, to get it back to the silver britches. That's the overall goal. And Nike's one of the few that can do that, because they've got some of it in the NFL now."
Read more here: http://www.macon.com/2013/04/02/2421536/georgia-adopts-a-bulldog-bold.html#storylink=cpy
I understand that "metallics" is one of the hardest things to represent consistently, given that it needs to appear on various types of cloth, of paper, of plastic, and digitally. But invoking the Cowboys doesn't fill me with confidence:
Look at the pants and the helmet above. Would any rational person call those THE SAME? Fortunately, our scheme doesn't require the same metallic color represented in two different materials, but how fucking hard can it be to create silver britches?
So at the end of the day, I really like and endorse what we've done. We're still Red and Black. We're still committed to the G. We still have the Arches. We're still the Dawgs. We still have the G as our primary logo. We didn't go "Full Oregon." We tweaked. We refined. We streamlined. We strengthened our brand. And in the long run, I think that's a good thing.
Go Dawgs. All of them.
Saturday, March 30, 2013
Game of Thrones Podcast: Season 3 Preview
Guess what? Winter is still coming. And so is season 3 of Game of Thrones.
I joined the Tuning In To SciFi TV Gang to discuss Season 2 of Game of Thrones, and preview the upcoming Season 3 which starts tomorrow night.
For the link to the Tuning in to SciFi TV page for the podcast (where you can direct download and/or play in your browser), go here:
Game of Thrones Season 3 Preview Show
For the entire Tuning in to SciFi TV podcast feed in iTunes, you will find it here.
Friday, March 29, 2013
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Pick Me! My Doug Loves Movies Signage
Surely everyone listens to Doug Loves Movies, right? It's my favorite podcast, and if you're not already a regular listener, here's a quick overview from Wikipedia:
The bare bones DLM site is here. And you can find the podcast in iTunes here. If you like movies, games and fun, go subscribe right now.
The show typically opens with Doug and guests talking about movies, and then segues into the "games" portion. Before you get to the Leonard Maltin Game, there is often a round or two of warm up games, which can include "Build a Title," "How Much Did This Shit Make?" and/or "A-B-C-Deez Nuts."
The celebrity guests compete not only to advance to the season-ending "Tournament of Championships" (an ultra-competitive "Super Bowl" of the Leonard Maltin Game), but also for fans in the audience where the podcast is being recorded. Each guest picks one audience member to play for, and if that celebrity wins, their corresponding fan wins a prize pack of items brought by Doug and the panel. Fans wanting to be picked by a guest hold up signs, almost always relating to movies, with their names on them.
I've never been to a DLM live show, but if I did go, I put together what would be my sign. Not only is it one of my favorite movies, it also lends itself well to incorporating my name:
In 2006, comedian Doug Benson began hosting a weekly comedy podcast, titled Doug Loves Movies (Formerly I Love Movies with Doug Benson), which is recorded in front of a live audience at the Upright Citizens Brigade Theatre in Los Angeles. The show typically tapes weekly, and is later archived on iTunes for fans to listen to for free. Benson and guests talk about movies and comedy both. Benson's guests have included such notables as John Lithgow, Leonard Maltin, Brian Posehn, Joe Rogan, Zach Galifianakis, Sarah Silverman, Patton Oswalt, Jon Hamm, Adam Carolla, David Cross, Bob Odenkirk, Scott Aukerman, Adam Scott, Bill Simmons, Aziz Ansari, Amy Poehler, Elizabeth Shue, Aubrey Plaza, Michael Cera, Edgar Wright, Paul F. Tompkins and Jordan, the baseball-toting superfan.
A regular feature of the podcast is the Leonard Maltin Game, which has been described as Name That Tune with movies instead of songs. The game consists of Benson reading the cast of an unknown movie in reverse order (star of the movie comes last) from Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide to his guests, who attempt to guess the movie.
The bare bones DLM site is here. And you can find the podcast in iTunes here. If you like movies, games and fun, go subscribe right now.
The show typically opens with Doug and guests talking about movies, and then segues into the "games" portion. Before you get to the Leonard Maltin Game, there is often a round or two of warm up games, which can include "Build a Title," "How Much Did This Shit Make?" and/or "A-B-C-Deez Nuts."
The celebrity guests compete not only to advance to the season-ending "Tournament of Championships" (an ultra-competitive "Super Bowl" of the Leonard Maltin Game), but also for fans in the audience where the podcast is being recorded. Each guest picks one audience member to play for, and if that celebrity wins, their corresponding fan wins a prize pack of items brought by Doug and the panel. Fans wanting to be picked by a guest hold up signs, almost always relating to movies, with their names on them.
I've never been to a DLM live show, but if I did go, I put together what would be my sign. Not only is it one of my favorite movies, it also lends itself well to incorporating my name:
Thursday, March 14, 2013
The Google Reader Apocalypse: First Reactions
Last night, Google announced they are going to "retire" the beloved Google Reader, to narrow their focus to products like fucking goggles and self-driving cars.
A feelings collage of my initial reactions:

What I most appreciated is that they seem eager to welcome new users, and make things as easy as possible. (Also important -- if you currently use Google Reader, the addition of your account to Feedly couldn't be any simpler, and they assure us that via their cloning of the Reader API, we won't even notice an interruption in service once Reader goes dark). They've also published a handy guide for new users (though eventually I'll want a more detailed and comprehensive "how to"):
So what about y'all? Is Reader as much a part of your daily life as it is mine? Did you treat yesterday's news like the coming Apocalypse? Have you already experimented with some of the alternatives? Can we all take a deep breath and get through this together?
A feelings collage of my initial reactions:
From some corners of the internet, there was a collective shrug. "What's Google Reader?" To those people, I ask:
HOW THE HELL DO YOU READ THE INTERNET?
No, seriously. How do you read information on the web? Do you just visit your favorite sites again and again, clicking on the "refresh" button waiting for new content to magically appear? Do you go through your bookmarks on some kind of regular rotation, hoping you catch what your favorite author or blogger has written? What about on your mobile device? How do you keep up to date with info on those? Do you actually visit websites on those tiny screens and pinch and scroll to read a post?
I just can't fathom that.
To understand how awful this development is, I should probably share exactly how I use RSS feeds and Reader. Google Reader is my home base.
I subscribe to things I want to read. As noted above, I have 104 subscriptions that I read on a daily basis. Sometimes, it's to a entire site with a narrow focus (like something on UGA football). Other times, it's to a particular author on a site where I don't want the rest of the content on that site (like Alan Sepinwall at HitFix). Some feeds publish 30+ items a day. Some publish once a week. Regardless of the schedule, when they do publish something, it shows up in Reader.
Then I have choices. I can read it then, inline inside Reader. I can click it and make the post expand to a full tab on the author's site. I can mark it read. I can "star" it and save it for later. It's great, and I feel completely in control of my news feed.
I keep a tab for Reader open and locked in my browser 24/7. I'm constantly aware of it, and that's my primary method of consuming news and content.
I also group feeds in folders. There are folders for "General Sports" and "Dawg Sports." There is a catch-all "Entertainment" folder, and one for my preferred, top shelf TV writers. There's one for "Tech & Toys" and one for "Marketing." And so on. All organized to suit my individual tastes, and coming to me without my having to go click around and find it.
Also, the primary collection of all these feeds (now housed and operated by Google) not only comes into Reader, it also feeds third party apps, such as those I use on my iDevices. Personally, I prefer Reeder. Different people use different apps, but the scary thing is, most are all fed by the Google monster, which is going away in a few short months.
I was happy to see "Google Reader" trending on twitter last night along with widespread web outrage over the company's decision to sunset one of their very useful and utilitarian products. (Yes, we all like GMail and search and maps -- but who the hell uses their social network?)
Look, this is Day One of the death march towards July 1. So my complete panic and freakout may be premature. Google may change their mind. Someone may come up with a seamless way to transition. Someone may create a tool that functions exactly like Reader. Surely folks are ready to step into the void.
Last night, I investigated several alternatives. Everyone's needs are different, but mine are basically:
- Keep all my feeds flowing, without interruption and with minimum hassle, now and beyond July 1.
- Provide the ability to keep my folders/groups of feeds.
- Give me the chance to easily "mark as read" in a variety of ways: an individual item, all the items in a folder/group, or even all the items that are current in all my folders/groups.
- The ability to "star" or "save for later" an item.
- The ability to easily manage feeds (delete them, put them in folders, etc.).
- The ability to easily add a new feed when I'm on an interesting new page or blog.
- The ability of all my feeds to easily flow into whatever app I'm using on my iPhone and iPad, and synchronize back (reads, stars, etc.) so that I can seamlessly pick up where I left off when I pick up a new device.
- Have different reading modes: seeing only headlines so you can skim, or being able to expand with full content and graphics.
- And hopefully, be visually interesting.
First, a quick reaction from IOS app Reeder:
So that's cool.
I also investigated a bunch of other options. Lifehacker published a list of alternatives. So did a variety of other publications. I imagine as the crisis continues (seriously, surely this deserves more attention than all this Pope nonsense), we'll get a slew of pieces on just what those of us with the ReaderFever should do next.
I did pick up one app to beta test alongside my current Reader/Reeder set up: Feedly. The primary reason I picked this one, is that it promises a smooth and seamless transition of all your current feeds to their service: now and when Reader goes dark. For more on that, see this post:
The web version installs an add-on to your browser (I use Firefox. There's one for Chrome, too). It takes you to a page with all your stuff. Visually, it's quite different at first, and will take some getting used to. Same for the IOS app (which is free, and for both iPad and iPhone). There are options and settings which allow for customization, but I'm still exploring those. It's very clean and pretty:Google announced today that they will be shutting down Google Reader. This is something we have been expecting for some time: We have been working on a project called Normandy which is a feedly clone of the Google Reader API – running on Google App Engine. When Google Reader shuts down, feedly will seamlessly transition to the Normandy back end. So if you are a Google Reader user and using feedly, you are covered: the transition will be seamless.
What I most appreciated is that they seem eager to welcome new users, and make things as easy as possible. (Also important -- if you currently use Google Reader, the addition of your account to Feedly couldn't be any simpler, and they assure us that via their cloning of the Reader API, we won't even notice an interruption in service once Reader goes dark). They've also published a handy guide for new users (though eventually I'll want a more detailed and comprehensive "how to"):
Tips for Google Reader users migrating to feedly
Welcome to all the new Google Reader users migrating to feedly. Here are some tips on how to adapt to the feedly desktop interface.So for the next few weeks, I'm going to run both Reader and Feedly simultaneously to see how they work, and see if I can orient myself to a whole new world. Thus far, I'm pretty impressed with Feedly, and we'll see how they react to a flood of new users coming their way with very specific needs and wants. And I'm sure new RSS Champions will step into the void.
So what about y'all? Is Reader as much a part of your daily life as it is mine? Did you treat yesterday's news like the coming Apocalypse? Have you already experimented with some of the alternatives? Can we all take a deep breath and get through this together?
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Talking "Echo," The Original Dollhouse Pilot
Saturday, I had the chance to guest on John Pavlich's SOFA DOGS podcast to discuss the original, unaired pilot of Dollhouse, "Echo."
I had a great time during my previous visit to the podcast to chat about another Whedon property, the sublime Cabin In The Woods, and this time was no different. Things we covered: Dollhouse would have made a great FX show. Is Eliza so criticized as an actress that she's actually underrated? A comparison of the two pilots and which one is actually better. FOX is not the evil empire and killer of genre shows. And of course, how fucking awesome is Olivia Williams/Adelle DeWitt? (on this I will brook no disagreement. The answer is "really fucking awesome").
Here's the page on the SOFA DOGS site where you can find the podcast.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Upton Saturday Night
When the Braves traded for Justin Upton, who will join brother B.J. and Jason Heyward in what is arguably MLB's most talented outfield, I got excited for the upcoming season. So much so that I signed up for Extra Innings again, after letting my subscription lapse for a few years. Like everyone else, I also latched on to the clever moniker "Up, Up, and a Hey" that someone came up with to describe our new outfield.
Another random thought popped into my head, and that's the 1974 comedy Uptown Saturday Night. I remember watching that flick (and its sequels) with my parents when I was a kid, and wondered if I could put together something that was an homage to that movie's poster, but featuring our new acquisitions.
The original movie poster featured three primary characters in illustration, perfect for an outfield, along with an extensive cast of characters on the side panel, well-suited to a baseball lineup including a starting pitcher and a closer. A little bit of surfing and investigating later (not unexpectedly, it's hard to find a good image of a movie poster from almost 40 years ago; plus identifying the funky font used, or something close to it, was quite a task) I put together the elements needed to create a loving tribute to a classic comedy and the 2013 Braves. My Photoshop skills aren't the greatest, and I worked some fairly lo-res images, but I think the end result turned out to be pretty fun.
Now playing: UPTON SATURDAY NIGHT
Needless to say, GO BRAVES!
Another random thought popped into my head, and that's the 1974 comedy Uptown Saturday Night. I remember watching that flick (and its sequels) with my parents when I was a kid, and wondered if I could put together something that was an homage to that movie's poster, but featuring our new acquisitions.
The original movie poster featured three primary characters in illustration, perfect for an outfield, along with an extensive cast of characters on the side panel, well-suited to a baseball lineup including a starting pitcher and a closer. A little bit of surfing and investigating later (not unexpectedly, it's hard to find a good image of a movie poster from almost 40 years ago; plus identifying the funky font used, or something close to it, was quite a task) I put together the elements needed to create a loving tribute to a classic comedy and the 2013 Braves. My Photoshop skills aren't the greatest, and I worked some fairly lo-res images, but I think the end result turned out to be pretty fun.
Now playing: UPTON SATURDAY NIGHT
And to compare it to the original:
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Talking TV with Steph

Sunday, I was the guest host for "What's On with Steph & Des," a podcast discussing the previous week in television. I've been on the show before as a fill-in host, and it's always fun to talk TV with Steph when Des is vacationing.
To give you an idea of what we covered, here were the suggested titles for this episode:
Why is the Dialogue So Bad?
Guest Hosts Don't Watch Shows with Kids
People in the Asylum are Having a Bad Day
How Does This Coin Exist in Haven?
You can find the show at their site HERE.
Or the iTunes link to their show HERE.
Monday, August 13, 2012
Bulldog Schedule Desktop Wallpapers
So, I was looking at the Dawgs 2012 football schedule this weekend, planning my trips back to the motherland, and decided to frak around with some ways to turn that schedule into a handy desktop wallpaper. Here's how that turned out:
For each week, I choose a representative opponent helmet shot (or in the case of the bye week, a better "shot," if you know what I mean). Since we all pretty much know when these games are happening, I didn't spell out the month, just abbreviating it to the first letter. For away games, I added the "@" symbol after the date (and in the case of Georgia/Florida, identified that by yes-we'll-always-call-it-that designation of "WLOCP"). This one has the sched broken down across the top on a grass field.
This one has a grey background, with the opponent squares also tinted with one of their school colors.
This one is on our traditional red, with the opponents organized by actual month.
If you like, feel free to use them. Go Dawgs.
For each week, I choose a representative opponent helmet shot (or in the case of the bye week, a better "shot," if you know what I mean). Since we all pretty much know when these games are happening, I didn't spell out the month, just abbreviating it to the first letter. For away games, I added the "@" symbol after the date (and in the case of Georgia/Florida, identified that by yes-we'll-always-call-it-that designation of "WLOCP"). This one has the sched broken down across the top on a grass field.
This one has a grey background, with the opponent squares also tinted with one of their school colors.
If you like, feel free to use them. Go Dawgs.
Saturday, July 21, 2012
So, about that Braves game last night.
Those of you who follow me on the twitters know I went to
last night’s Braves – Nats game. The opportunity came up because my friend’s
company has season tickets for the Nats, and occasionally gives away some of
the seats to their employees. She’s not really a baseball, or Nats, fan, but
always puts her name in when the Braves are in town because A) she knows my
love for the Bravos, and B) is awesome.
It turns out we got tickets to Friday night’s tilt, and on
paper, it looked great. Friday night game. Hanson vs. Strasburg. Start of a
four game series, with only three and a half games separating the Braves from
the first place Nationals.
However, there were omens and portents. An 80% chance of
thunderstorms. The fact that the map data in my indispensable GPS is over a
year old, and the easiest route from my place to her office (where I was
picking her up) is much newer.*
*If you have ZERO sense of direction, and rely on the GPS to get out of your own parking lot, you can imagine how disconcerting it was to drive 20 miles or so while the 8-bit representation of your car basically motors through a cartoon tableau of marshland with no visible roads. If I was Neo in the Matrix, I’d have freaked the fuck out.
Still, I made it her place; we packed some rain gear and
headed out to the ballpark.
We made it to the stadium with time to spare and got some
sweet parking: a 5 minute (or less) walk from the home plate gate. (Aside: if
you need event parking, you should definitely check out ParkWhiz.com. In a
nutshell, it’s a “StubHub for parking.” They’re not in every city yet, but they
organize and contract with private lots around facilities, and allow you to
reserve parking over the web and/or your phone. The official lots had reserved
parking for $42. I was able to get a spot much closer for less than half that.
Another aside: now I know where Washington D.C. parks all their cement mixers
when they are not in use).
We get to the gate, and the attendant helpfully informs us
that tonight is a beer stein giveaway – but not at this gate. If we want one,
it’s “just two gates over.” We talk about it, and think “sure, why not. Free is
free, and why not get a beer stein?” We start walking around, get about 40
feet, and don’t see signs for another gate. I’m initially thinking this might
be like Sanford Stadium or some other large facility with dozens of gates, and
therefore “two over” might not be that far. However, something is nagging at
me, and I stop to ask another attendant how many gates there are in total. She
tells me there is one for each “base.” Meaning, there are four total. So “two
over” is actually 180 degrees away – all the way on the completely opposite
side of the stadium. Well, they could have been offering us beer out of a free
motherfucking Holy Grail, and I wasn’t walking completely around to the center
field gate.
That decision made, we go in through the home plate gate and
quickly find our seats. Terrific sightlines, about 30 rows back along the first
base side.
The Nats’ stadium is quite nice, for what it is. It doesn’t
have the red brick charm of its regional counterpart, Camden Yards. And they
basically plopped it down in the middle of D.C., so there’s only so much you
can do with it, but it’s clean and well organized and new. Where we were
sitting, we had great access to the (slow-moving) concession lines, bathrooms
and even a smoking section outside the gate. We got a couple of brewskis and
sat down. There were a few open seats around us, and even a Braves fan in front
of me. Robin isn’t steeped in baseball lore, so I had a good time explaining to
her Chipper’s historical significance and various baseball jargon (like you
call a “four run homer” a “Grand Slam,” but yet there’s no nickname for a “three
run homer” – it’s just a “three run homer”). We also had a fascinating
conversation about the selection of the batters’ walk up music.**
**Such as, can you “trademark” your walk up song (or coming in from the bullpen song if you’re a closer)? No, not technically, but ostensibly, you want to choose something unique, and that hasn’t already become associated with another prominent player. Some are just perfect, like Chipper’s “Crazy Train,” Hoffman’s “Hells Bells” or Rivera’s “Enter Sandman.” Other conclusions: almost any AC/DC plays like gangbusters, country songs never work, and I can never recognize what the hell most Latin players have. Were I an everyday player, I would probably have “Bohemian Like You” (great opening drum and guitar riff), “When the Levee Breaks” or the theme song from Buffy the Vampire Slayer (c’mon, you know that’s awesome. Builds to a fantastic, fired-up crescendo. And Joss is my lord and savior. And I would probably get plunked more than Craig Biggio).
It wasn’t raining yet, so we put our rain gear in the empty
seat to my left and set about “enjoying” the action.
I put “enjoying” in quotes, because the opening stanzas were
torture for a Braves fan. Oh, I had great company and it was a wonderful
setting, but Hanson looked lost. I think he had 247 pitches (unofficial count)
through the first four innings, and that shot Morse hit landed somewhere near
the Smithsonian.
Midway through the fourth, we went to get some beer and
brats (very good ballpark bratwurst, there, BTW). While we were in the
concourse, the rain started coming down. Robin went to get some French fries,
and I went back down to our seats to grab my rain jacket. When I get there, the
seat where I put it was empty. I was perplexed. Had someone stolen it when all
the spectators were running back into the concourse? Had it fallen through the
seat and onto the floor? Was I in the right section? Then, I look a couple of
seats down to my left, and what do I see but some random dude sitting there in
the rain, watching the game, WEARING MY RAINCOAT. All zipped up. Hood on. Acting
like “how cool is it that I remembered to bring this bright red rain jacket,
and that I can sit here staying dry watching the Nats.” What the fuck is this?
I think I’ll use this philosophy in the future. Say I’m hungry, I’ll just walk
into my neighbor’s house, go through their refrigerator, and make myself a
sandwich. “Sorry, you weren’t actively eating this luncheon meat, and I was
hungry, and it was right there next to me, so I just thought would appropriate it
for myself.” WHO STEALS AND WEARS A STRANGER’S CLOTHING AT A BALLPARK? AND SITS THERE 4 FEET FROM THE CRIME? I said, “uh,
can I have my raincoat, please?” Without even looking sheepish, he takes it off
and hands it back to me. I think there was a mumbled apology, but I was so
flabbergasted, I didn’t say anything in return. I put it on and headed back up
to the concourse. When I got there, I told a disbelieving Robin about the “raincoat
adoption.” Fortunately, she has fresh, huge cup of French fries to make
everything better. Then, in short order: the rain starts coming down harder.
The barely touched French fries fall off their perch, onto the floor behind a
grate. And Zimmerman hits a three run bomb (no nickname). Now it’s raining, 9-0 and an “official”
game.
I think you can see where this is heading.
It’s here where I should bring up “the jinx.” Living out of
market, I don’t get to watch the games with the regularity I did back in my
beloved South. I can see them when they play on FOX, TBS, ESPN or MLB in a “nationally”
televised game, but unless I purchased Extra Innings, I’m missing all the
Peachtree TV and SportsSouth games. I do get to see them via the Nationals
broadcasts, which in my case, are “in market.” Early on in my time here, it
seemed that when I purchased Extra Innings and/or watched the games, we would
lose. Or slump. Or there’d be an injury. When I followed along via the MLB app
or ESPN Gamecast, we’d do well. In fact, on twitter, this became a running joke
between me and two other Braves fans, Jen (out of market in San Diego) and
Angie (in market in Georgia). Was it bad luck when I watched? What happened when Jen watched? Did Angie need to watch? What if we all watched? What was the cause of the bad juju? And who was the jinx?
From Thursday:
So, we won on Thursday, and were still left to ponder what karmic elements contribute to a win or a loss.
Friday, after I tweeted that I was at the ballpark, I received this note of encouragement:
Hanson starts doing his impression of a human batting tee, and this:
And this:
And this:
Well, at this point, my phone is dying***, it's still raining, we're mourning our downed potato soldiers, our beers are empty, our seats are beside the Al Capone of raincoats and it's NINE TO NOTHING.
***There's no way in hell my iPhone will last on a Dawgs game day. Having had a BlackBerry for years, I hardly ever worried about battery life. Days upon days with heavy usage and nary a problem. However, since pulling the plug on a terminal patient earlier this year and switching to an iPhone, I'm constantly watching that little battery meter drop in real-time. From leaving my casa around 3 PM, until I got home late last night, it went from 100% down to around 30%. The iPhone does a lot of wonderful things, but folks, sustaining life ain't one of 'em. It uses more power than The Manhattan Project, doesn't allow you to swap in a new, fresh battery and I think I'm going to sit at the tailgate in Athens connected to jumper cables and a Sears Die-Hard.
So we leave.
I turn the game on the car radio, and in the time it took us to leave the stadium and walk the block and a half back to the car, the Braves have scored four runs.
Apparently, this is a "visual jinx," as I listen to the game on XM all the way home and the Braves rally to take the lead. (I can't explain the Kimbrel blown save -- perhaps someone in a house alongside the road had the game on, and I caught a glimpse of their television as I drove past).
When I walk in my front door, I turn on the TV to see the Nats post-game show.
BRAVES WIN! BRAVES WIN!
I think we have our answer.
Post Script:
Sunday, May 27, 2012
Talking Game of Thrones (Episodes 5&6 and 7&8)
If you've been keeping up with the podcast feed (or my twitter), you probably know this already. But in case you haven't, I've been talking with Wendy and some of the folks from Tuning in to SciFi TV about Game of Thrones all season. I'm the lone book-reader on the podcast, but no worries about spoilers -- I only discuss the novels as they relate to minor plot changes (like Qarth) or character digressions (Tywin & Arya, for example, or Talisa) from what we've seen on-screen thus far.
These discussions are a lot of fun, and I hope you enjoy them.
For links to the Tuning in to SciFi TV pages for each podcast (where you can direct download and/or play in your browser), go here:
Episodes 5 ("The Ghost of Harrenhall") and 6 ("The Old Gods and the New").
Episodes 7 ("A Man Without Honor") and 8 ("The Prince of Winterfell").
For the entire Tuning in to SciFi TV podcast feed in iTunes, you will find it here.
Bring on The Blackwater tonight!
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Listen To Me!
Not a lot of blog posting lately, but I have been recorded chatting with some smart and fun people about things that should be of interest to you.
You can find the podcast at the Tuning in to SciFi TV page for the episode here (for direct download and/or play in the browser).
Or, to find the feed for the entire Tuning in to SciFi TV podcast in iTunes, click here.
Winter is Still Coming:
We're getting deeper into the second season of Game of Thrones, and once again, I joined the gang from the Tuning Into Sci-Fi TV podcast for thoughts and analysis on the most recent episodes. We just recorded our take on episodes 5 & 6 Tuesday night (and that will probably go up this weekend), but to tide you over, in case you missed it, here's a link to our discussions on episodes 3 & 4 ("What is Dead May Never Die" and "Garden of Bones"):You can find the podcast at the Tuning in to SciFi TV page for the episode here (for direct download and/or play in the browser).
Or, to find the feed for the entire Tuning in to SciFi TV podcast in iTunes, click here.
"Am I on speakerphone?"
I also joined Steph Smith and John Pavlich to talk about the gloriously inventive and funny Cabin in the Woods on John's SOFA DOGS podcast. You can find that here on his web page. Or in iTunes, for the full podcast feed.
Labels:
Cabin in the Woods,
Game of Thrones,
movies,
podcasts,
Television,
whedon
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Quick Non-Spoilery Thoughts on "The Cabin in the Woods"
I'll start with the simplest sentiment: go see this. See it now. Don't spoil yourself or read too much about it. Just go see it and trust that you'll have a terrific time at the movies.
Now, to address a few things I've seen on twitter or in comment sections:
"I don't like horror. Will I like this?"
I'm not what you call a horror fan. I do enjoy a few of the classics (The Exorcist, The Shining, Carrie, Alien, etc.), and have watched many of the 80s and 90s kill-the-teens slasher flicks (which, if you've seen, will make you appreciate just how much Cabin plays with genre tropes), but I don't go out of my way to see horror movies, and would put them toward the bottom of the genres that I enjoy. Given that, I enjoyed the hell out of Cabin, and would recommend it to horror lovers and horror neophytes without reservations.
"I don't like gore and blood and scares."
At the end of the day, this is much a spin on the genre as it is a "pure" horror movie, but it does have scares and character deaths. Judge your tolerance for such like this: it has as many "scares" as does a top flight episode of Supernatural, and as much (or less) blood and gore as an episode of Game of Thrones. This stuff is there, of course, but Cabin is in no way equal to things like Hostel or the Saw franchise.
"Well, if it's not shit-your-pants scary, then why is it a horror movie?"
I can't answer this without going into spoilers, but it plays with the conventions and tropes of horror as skillfully as any movie I've ever seen. Think along the lines of Shawn of the Dead or the Evil Dead movies.There have been a lot of comparisons to Scream, and while you could make parallels, the teen characters themselves don't consciously comment on the self-awareness of the typical horror movie conventions. Rather, the narrative and presentation of the movie itself does, though there is a (spoilery) explanation for why these tropes exist -- all over the world -- in the first place. HOWEVER, you WILL see many of the things you, as a viewer, have come to expect in a horror movie. Dark, forbidding places. Exploration and confusion filled with tension and dread. Supernatural creatures and acts of violence.
Additionally:
- It's FUNNY. I mean, laugh out loud funny. Yes, of course, the script is filled with your trademark Whedon wit, but there's also the comedy of recognition. Not just recognizing the average horror movie plot elements and tropes that are being paraded before you (though there are those in spades), but also the recognition that comes from watching the layers of the movie get peeled back, and peeled back and peeled back again until you honestly guffaw audibly in the theatre at the sheer scope and audacity of the thing. The casting is uniformly excellent (and Whedon fans will smile at the familiar faces), but Richard Jenkins and Bradley Whitford own this movie. Every moment they are on the screen is pure gold.
- The other thing that makes me adore this movie is what's going on underneath (and I don't mean that in only the literal sense). It has some amusing -- and thought-provoking -- things to say about free will, our increasingly voyeuristic society, and our complicity in the horrors of our entertainment. I won't say more than that to keep this spoiler-free, but I can guarantee there will be scholarly analysis of what this movie is putting down for years to come. But that makes it sound stodgy. Did I mention that it's just FUCKING FUNNY?
Bottom line: Go see Cabin in the Woods. Like, now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















